In this section
Home > Publications > Third party publications > The strategic business plan
The strategic business plan
On 8 January 2013, Network Rail published its strategic business plan (SBP) and supporting documentation, which is the company’s main submission to us for PR13. The SBP sets out how Network Rail proposes to deliver the outputs sought by the Scottish Ministers and the Secretary of State in their high-level output specifications (HLOSs) published in June and July 2012 respectively, and how much Network Rail considers this would cost.
The SBP is a critical document for PR13, which we will be reviewing thoroughly ahead of producing our PR13 draft determination in June 2013. This will set out our proposed conclusions on what Network Rail must deliver in the period 2014-19 and how much funding it should receive.
Whilst not a formal consultation, we sought stakeholders views (
PDF 184 Kb) on the SBP to help inform our analysis. We also held a stakeholder workshop at which Network Rail presented its SBP and we chaired a discussion.
Workshop slides and note
- ORR’s introductory slides (
233 Kb) - Network Rail’s workshop slides (
1,104 Kb) - Note of the main comments raised at the workshop (
62 Kb)
Main themes arising from the comments on the SBP
We received over 170 submissions and comments on the SBP. We are grateful to those who responded. We have published the non-confidential responses we received from organisations below. We also received a significant number of responses from individuals and MPs. Whilst we have considered these, we have not published them below. Given the breadth of some of the responses and specific suggestions made, we have also made all non-confidential responses available to Network Rail.
Whilst we are not going to comment on the individual responses provided to us, we note some key themes that arose from them:
- Enhancements: Understandably, a large number of stakeholders supported improvements to the railway – particularly those that would improve journey experience and boost the economy in their local area. This included both those schemes proposed in the SBP and other improvements and projects that had not been included. There was widespread support for electrification and suggestions of other routes where electrification would be beneficial.
- Performance: stakeholders wanted better and more consistent performance from the railway, across all routes and services. There were concerns that Network Rail had not been ambitious enough in looking to deliver improvements on some routes.
- Network availability: The need for a more joined up approach to planned engineering work was emphasised, which minimises disruption to passengers and freight services and keeps the railway open for more of the time.
- Funds: There was substantial support for the various ‘funding pots’ – such as for small scale improvements to stations and services, and demands for transparent governance arrangements to be put in place for the allocation of these.
- Provision of depot facilities: many stakeholders were concerned that insufficient consideration has been given to the need for depot facilities to support the larger train fleets required to deliver the increase in capacity required in CP5.
We are currently in the process of producing our draft determination. We will then publish this on 12 June 2013, and seek stakeholders’ views on this. Following this, we review stakeholders’ views before publishing our final determination on 31 October 2013.
Responses from stakeholder organisations on the SBP
- Alliance (
279 Kb)
- Association of Transport Co-ordinating Officers (ATCO) (
51 Kb)
- Barking – Gospel Oak Line User Group (
122 Kb) - Better Trains for Chepstow (
110 Kb)
- Birmingham Airport (
147 Kb) - Birmingham City Council (
57 Kb)
- Borough Council of King’s Lynn & West Norfolk (
29 Kb)
- Bradford Council (
77 Kb)
- Braintree District Council (
144 Kb)
- Bristol Airport (
38 Kb)
- Broadland District Council (
56 Kb)
- Calderdale Council (
145 Kb) - Cambridge Heath and London Fields Rail Users Group (
16 Kb) - Campaign for Rail (
64 Kb)
- Capital Rail Action Group (CRAG) (
28 Kb)
- Centro (
148 Kb)
- Chelmsford City Council (
98 Kb)
- Chelmsford Commuters and Rail Travellers (
269 Kb)
- Chiltern Railways (
1,564 Kb)
- Chingford Line Users’ Association (
129 Kb)
- City of Edinburgh Council (
30 Kb)
- Civil Engineering contractors Association (CECA) (
217 Kb)
- The Cockburn Association (
121 Kb) - Colchester Borough Council (
1,113 Kb)
- Cheshire and Warrington Local Transport Body (CWLTB) (
88 Kb) - Derbyshire County Council (
14 Kb)
- East Midlands Councils (
155 Kb)
- East Midlands Trains (
38 Kb)
- Edenbridge & District Rail Travellers' Association (
22 Kb)
- Enfield Council (
682 Kb)
- East Sussex Rail Alliance (ESRA) (
26 Kb) - Essex Chambers of Commerce first response (
102 Kb)
- Essex Chambers of Commerce second response (
609 Kb)
- Essex County Council (
36 Kb)
- Fenland District Council (
46 Kb)
- First Great Western (
68 Kb)
- First/Keolis Transpennine Limited (
79 Kb)
- FoFNL (Friends of the Far North Line) (
22 Kb) - Forest Heath District Council and St Edmundsbury Borough Council (
18 Kb) - Great Manchester Chamber of Commerce (
18 Kb)
- Great Yarmouth Borough Council (
72 Kb) - Greater Anglia (
67 Kb)
- Harborough Rail Users (
328 Kb)
- Havering Borough Council (
2,081 Kb)
- Heathrow Airport (
91 Kb) - Hertfordshire County Council (
48 Kb) - Hitchin Rail User Group (
13 Kb)
- The Highland and Islands Transport Partnership (Hitrans) (
46 Kb) - London Assembly Transport Committee (
36 Kb)
- London Borough of Hackney (
21 Kb) - London Borough of Newham Council (
916 Kb) - London Borough of Redbridge (
309 Kb)
- London Overground (
56 Kb)
- London TravelWatch (
52 Kb)
- Luton Borough Council (
1,204 Kb)
- Manningtree Rail Users Association (MRUA) (
52 Kb) - Merseytravel (
625 Kb)
- Metro (
44 Kb)
- Mid Anglia Rail Passengers Association (MARPA) (
13 Kb)
- National Union of Rail Maritime & Transport Workers (RMT) (
130 Kb)
- Norfolk County Council (
65 Kb) - North London Strategic Alliance (
2,129 Kb) - North London Transport Partnership (
44 Kb) - Northern Rail (
170 Kb) - Norwich City Council (
26 Kb) - Nottingham County Council (
51 Kb) - ONTRACK Rail Users Association (
107 Kb) - Oxford-Bicester Rail Action Group (
18 Kb) - Plymouth City Council (
216 Kb) - Public Transport Consortium (PTC) (
26 Kb) - Rail Freight Group (
27 Kb) - Railfuture (
389 Kb) - RailWatch (
16 Kb) - Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council (
105 Kb) - Scottish Association for Public Transport (
125 Kb) - South East of Scotland Transport Partnership (SEStran) (
60 Kb) - South Lanarkshire Council (
579 Kb) - South London Partnership (
339 Kb) - South Yorkshire Integrated Transport Authority (SYITA) (
180 Kb) - Southern Railway (
40 Kb) - Staffordshire County Council (
25 Kb) - Stansted Airport (
378 Kb) - Suffolk Chamber of Commerce (
686 Kb) - Suffolk City Council (
43 Kb) - Suffolk Coastal Distrct Council (
17 Kb) - Tandridge Distrct Council (
32 Kb) - Technical Strategy Leadership Group (
329 Kb) - Tendring District Council (
81 Kb) - Thames Valley Berkshire Local Enterprise Partnership (
222 Kb) - The Forum Trust (
483 Kb) - Thurrock Council (
14 Kb) - Transform Scotland (
82 Kb) - Transport for Greater Manchester (
1,506 Kb) - Transport for London (
1,295 Kb) - TravelWatch East Midlands (
46 Kb) - TravelWatch SouthWest (
197 Kb) - Virgin Trains (
1,873 Kb) - Visit East Anglia (
47 Kb) - Visit Norwich (
67 Kb) - Walsall Council (
1,180 Kb) - Wandsworth Council (
415 Kb) - West Anglia Routes Group (
40 Kb) - West of England (
70 Kb) - Witham Rail Users Group (
39 Kb) - West London Line Group (WLLG)
(
72 Kb)



456 Kb)